Political Polarization in Pakistan: Implications for Governance and Social Cohesion

Authors

  • Iftikhar Alam Pakistan Administrative Services, Government of Pakistan Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.65755/jpa-20254601-101

Keywords:

polarization, democratic process, governance, intra-elite, media

Abstract

Political polarization in Pakistan has deepened over the past decade, leading to the hardening of ethnic, ideological, and political fault lines. This national fragmentation on several lines engenders profoundly adverse implications, resultantly impacting governance and social cohesion. The increasing erosion of public trust in institutions and lack of consensus have almost made the democratic process in Pakistan dysfunctional. This study examines how political polarization has had a profound impact on governance and social cohesion, particularly since 2013. It explores the underlying causes of political polarization coupled with deteriorating social cohesion, including an array of contributing factors such as media role, ethnic-cum-ideological schism, and economic inequality, and analyzes their consequences for governance and national integration. The research employs a mixed-method approach. It integrates qualitative insights with quantitative data, gathered via Google Forms. Diversity has been ensured by including respondents from different backgrounds—professionals, students, and officials. The study findings suggest that political polarization contributes to policy failure, fosters public alienation from state institutions, and exacerbates governance gaps and precipitates societal fragmentation. In this equation, media-driven narratives and intra-elite conflict act as a catalyst by creating a conducive environment for the thriving of disinformation and extremist discourses at the cost of civic engagement. In light of the study’s findings, the paper concludes with policy recommendations intended for reducing polarization and promoting social cohesion through institutional reforms, improving media literacy, encouraging inclusivity, and focusing on national dialogue. A policy recommendation matrix is provided to guide practical reforms in governance, media regulation, and civil society engagement.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahmed, Z., & Afridi, M. K. (2014). Controlled Democracy and Political Opposition in Pakistan: A Case Study of Musharraf Era. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2014.v5n14p560 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2014.v5n14p560

Akdede, S., & Keyifli, N. (2019). Political Polarization, Income Inequality and Size of Government. In S. Oktar & Y. Taşkın, 34. International Public Finance Conference (pp. 402–407). Istanbul University Press. https://doi.org/10.26650/PB/SS10.2019.001.062 DOI: https://doi.org/10.26650/PB/SS10.2019.001.062

Akhtar, N. (2009a). POLARIZED POLITICS: THE CHALLENGE OF DEMOCRACY IN PAKISTAN. International Journal on World Peace, 26(2), 31–63.

Akhtar, N. (2009b). POLARIZED POLITICS: THE CHALLENGE OF DEMOCRACY IN PAKISTAN. International Journal on World Peace, 26(2), 31–63.

Carothers, T., & O’donohue, A. (2019). Democracies Divided: The Global Challenge of Political Polarization. Brookings Institution Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9780815750819

Fiorina, M. P., Abrams, S. J., & Pope, J. (2011). Culture war? : the myth of a polarized America. Longman.

Hanif, D. R. A., Sultan, I., & Haqeeq, M. M. (2024). POLITICAL POLARIZATION ISSUES AND CHALLENGES FACED BY PAKISTAN.

Ishaque, W., Mukhtar, M., & Tanvir, R. (2022). Political Polarization and Challenges of National Integration in Pakistan. ANNALS OF SOCIAL SCIENCES AND PERSPECTIVE, 3(1), 153–166. https://doi.org/10.52700/assap.v3i1.185 DOI: https://doi.org/10.52700/assap.v3i1.185

Khan, A., Rafique, I., & Nasim, A. (2023a). Social Media and Political Polarization in Pakistan. Global Digital & Print Media Review, VI(I), 242–253. https://doi.org/10.31703/gdpmr.2023(VI-I).19

Khan, A., Rafique, I., & Nasim, A. (2023b). Social Media and Political Polarization in Pakistan. Global Digital & Print Media Review, VI(I), 242–253. https://doi.org/10.31703/gdpmr.2023(VI-I).19 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31703/gdpmr.2023(VI-I).19

Khan, M. (2024). Political Memes and Affective Polarization: A Multimodal Critical Discourse Analysis of Pakistani Political Memes. Pakistan Review of Social Sciences (PRSS), 5(1), Article 1.

Khan, M. M. A., Hussain, M., & Bibi, K. (2023). Religio-Political Dynamism in the 20th Century Colonial India and Subsequent Muslim Response: A Case Study of the Punjab Province. Journal of Languages, Culture and Civilization, 5(2), 135–142. https://doi.org/10.47067/jlcc.v5i2.154

Lieven, A. (2012). Pakistan : a hard country. Public Affairs.

Maqsood Ahmad, A., Ashraf, R., Rasool, H., & Moazzam, N. (2023). Social Media and Political Polarization in Pakistan: A Case Study of Pakistani Youth. Journal of Languages, Culture and Civilization, 5, 135–148. https://doi.org/10.47067/jlcc.v5i2.154 DOI: https://doi.org/10.47067/jlcc.v5i2.154

Mason, L. (2018). Uncivil agreement: How politics became our identity. University of Chicago Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226524689.001.0001

Nisar, R. D., & AROOJ. (2022). THINKING CONTEMPORARY FACTORIAL POLITICAL FLUX & POLARIZATION ISSUES TO PAKISTAN’S GOVERNMENT: (A PANORAMIC APPRAISAL). The Journal of Contemporary Issues in Business and Government, 28(1), Article 1.

PM vows to make PKLI Lahore world-class hospital. (n.d.). Retrieved 29 October 2024, from https://www.radio.gov.pk/21-05-2023/govt-making-all-out-efforts-for-revival-of-pkli-lahore-pm

Press freedom predators’ gallery: Pakistan strongly rebuts RSF report. (2021, July 6). The News International. https://www.thenews.com.pk/print/860658-press-freedom-predators-gallery-pakistan-strongly-rebuts-rsf-report

Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: the Collapse and Revival of American Community. Simon & Schuster. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/358916.361990

Sadiq, R. (2024). Causes of Political Polarization in Pakistan from 1947 to 2024.

Traders analysts criticise PTI s protest plan calling itself destructive. (2024, October 13). The Express Tribune. https://tribune.com.pk/story/2502568/traders-analysts-criticise-ptis-protest-plan-calling-it-self-destructive

The News International: Latest News Breaking, Pakistan News. (n.d.). Retrieved 29 October 2024, from https://www.thenews.com.pk/

World Bank. (2007). Strengthening World Bank Group engagement on governance and anticorruption.

Wu, X., & Ali, S. (2020). The Novel Changes in Pakistan’s Party Politics: Analysis of Causes and Impacts. Chinese Political Science Review, 5(4), 513–533. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41111-020-00156-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41111-020-00156-z

Downloads

Published

2025-06-30

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Alam, I. (2025). Political Polarization in Pakistan: Implications for Governance and Social Cohesion . Journal of Pakistan Administration, 46(1), 112-154. https://doi.org/10.65755/jpa-20254601-101